Why criminal sanctions still matter in corporate governance

dc.contributor.authorMusikali, Lois M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-05T13:43:02Z
dc.date.available2020-02-05T13:43:02Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractThe general concern about the adequacy of self-regulation as a mode of policing corporations has once again come to the forefront of the corporate governance debate following the current economic crisis. Irresponsible lending to individuals who cannot afford to repay loans has resulted in the near collapse and nationalisation of banks such as Northern Rock and Bradford & Bingley in the United Kingdom and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the United States.1 Once again, the Government has had to intervene to prevent an economic crisis, by nationalising failing financial institutions to avoid them falling into liquidation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMusikali, Lois M. Why criminal sanctions still matter in corporate governance. International Company and Commercial Law Review, 2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.daystar.ac.ke/handle/123456789/3118
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Company and Commercial Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectCompany lawen_US
dc.subjectCivil lawen_US
dc.subjectCorporate governanceen_US
dc.subjectCriminal lawen_US
dc.titleWhy criminal sanctions still matter in corporate governanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Why criminal sanctions still matter in corporate governance.pdf
Size:
71.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections