Why criminal sanctions still matter in corporate governance
dc.contributor.author | Musikali, Lois M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-05T13:43:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-05T13:43:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.description.abstract | The general concern about the adequacy of self-regulation as a mode of policing corporations has once again come to the forefront of the corporate governance debate following the current economic crisis. Irresponsible lending to individuals who cannot afford to repay loans has resulted in the near collapse and nationalisation of banks such as Northern Rock and Bradford & Bingley in the United Kingdom and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the United States.1 Once again, the Government has had to intervene to prevent an economic crisis, by nationalising failing financial institutions to avoid them falling into liquidation. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Musikali, Lois M. Why criminal sanctions still matter in corporate governance. International Company and Commercial Law Review, 2009 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.daystar.ac.ke/handle/123456789/3118 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | International Company and Commercial Law Review | en_US |
dc.subject | Company law | en_US |
dc.subject | Civil law | en_US |
dc.subject | Corporate governance | en_US |
dc.subject | Criminal law | en_US |
dc.title | Why criminal sanctions still matter in corporate governance | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Why criminal sanctions still matter in corporate governance.pdf
- Size:
- 71.22 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Main Article
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.6 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: