Why Kenya should reconsider its ultra vires doctrine in corporate law
Loading...
Date
2010
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
International Company and Commercial Law Review
Abstract
The ultra vires1 doctrine in company law, namely that a company is formed only to pursue the objects specified in its memorandum of association and if it acts outside those objects the transaction is ultra vires and void,2 has for a long time been one of the more intractable problems facing persons dealing with companies in common law jurisdictions.3 Under the ultra vires doctrine, companies could avoid liability under contracts with innocent third parties on the ground that the company never had the power to enter into the said contracts in the first place. A significant number of common law
jurisdictions, including Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Hong Kong, and most recently England, have taken steps to abolish the doctrine of ultra vires. This article considers the provisions of Kenya's Companies Act (the Act)4 that provide for the
doctrines of ultra vires and why there is need to review them. The discussion within this article is limited to the ultra vires doctrine as it relates to the objects clause and not to the general breach of directors duties in public listed companies.
Description
Keywords
Company law, Kenya, Objects clauses, Special resolutions, Ultra vires
Citation
Musikali, Lois M. Why Kenya should reconsider its ultra vires doctrine in corporate law. International Company and Commercial Law Review, 2010